The fight, which threatened to spill into the crowd and potentially put courtside ticket holders in harm's way, is thankfully a rare occurrence in the modern NBA, so based on its rareness you can argue that the additional media coverage is justified. And while you'd think that the NBA likes the idea of New York residents getting exposed to highlights from a Pacers game - expanding its reach from the SportsCenter crowd and touching a broader audience that potentially includes casual basketball fans - it's not clear if footage of an almost-brawl is good or bad for the league. While on one hand the increased exposure is great, promoting the fight potentially cheapens the league's brand and might imply that Lee and Hibbert's antics were more entertaining than the game itself.
The fight between the Warriors and Pacers threatened to spill into the Bankers Life Fieldhouse stands.
As a fan of the NBA and a lover of professional basketball, I'd rather not have seen any highlights from this game than see it covered because of the fight. The scuffle marred what was otherwise an entertaining game between two of the NBA's better teams (coming into the game both were 10+ games over .500), and takes away from the season-long accomplishments of Hibbert and Lee, two of the league's better big men. Part of the blame certainly lies with the players, who allowed their emotions to get the best of them and shifted the focus from playing to brawling. I believe that more of the culpability, however, lies with the fans for showing more interest in video of the fight than in video of the rest of the game. While I can't blame the media for giving the people what they want, I can blame the people for wanting it.
No comments:
Post a Comment